Fight government secrecy. Please, see as well the message below the
notes of the article (info missing) means of information war threaten
democracy and mankind.This article has been deleted from websites of the Australian magazine New Dawn, Canadian Global Research and Czech internet newspaper Britske Listy because the authorities were afraid that it contains information convincing enough to alarm readers to the fact that their minds could be manipulated by their governments. Democracy is in danger, so forward this article to your friends. The article is being disseminated on Facebook across the globe.
The report on U.S. military policy by “Project for New American
Century” states: «It is now commonly understood that information and
other new technologies … are creating a dynamic that may threaten
America’s ability to exercise its dominant military power.
Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit those
transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq
and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear
weapons … the effects of information and other advanced technologies
promise to revolutionize the nature of conventional armed forces» (ref.
13, pg. 4 and 11). The military concept of information technologies is,
however, kept hidden from the world general public.
In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya, in the article «Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse»
(1), informed that in 1996 Russian government’s information agency
FAPSI warned that the effect of «informational means of war» is
comparable to «the effect of the use of weapon of mass destruction» and
produced a report entitled «Information Weapon as a Threat to National
Security of Russia».
In reaction, the Russian State Duma and consequently , the
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed
the United Nations, OBSE and the European Council with a proposal for
an international convention banning the development and use of
informational weapons. According to the same newspaper Segodnya in March
1998, the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan,
and included on the agenda of the General Assembly of the U.N. Most
probably the USA vetoed this proposal and in consequence, the ban of
informational weapons was not discussed by the United Nations General
Assembly.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation,
signed by President Putin in September 2000, among the dangers
threatening the informational security of the Russian Federation, there
is “the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and
citizens in the sphere of spiritual life and to individual, group and
societal consciousness” by “illegal use of special means affecting
individual, group and societal consciousness.” (16). Among “the main
areas of international cooperation of the Russian Federation in the
field of information security” , is listed “banning the development,
proliferation and application of ‘information weapons’ ” (17).
In the article under discussion Segodnya described «mysterious
information-psychological» means capable not only of harming human
health, but also of blocking human free will at the subconscious level,
impairing human beings’ ability of “political, cultural and other
self-identification» and even “causing destruction of indivisible
informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation”.
According to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin, those means are also
capable to kill people (2). Underneath the article, Segodnya published a
review of weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the
Russian Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave
weapons, there are also «psychotronic weapons» which, in addition to
having the capability of «transfering information among people», are
able to act on communication and electronic systems (1).
The Space Preservation Bill proposed by Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich
in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001, names the following
technologies enabling access to the human brain, human health impairment
or the killing of people: «land-based, sea-based or space-based systems
using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other
energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the
purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such
persons or populations» (4).
«Psychotronic weapon» listed in the Dennis J.
Kucinich’s bill is described as a weapon using «torsion fields»
radiation in the book «Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia»
(6) by Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov and Vladimir Lopatin (a
politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal
Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States).
Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche those
two authors list “generators of physical fields” of «known as well as
unknown nature» (14). It is common knowledge that both KGB and CIA
carried out a large-scale research of psychotronic phenomena in the 70’s
of the past century. It is not out of question that their scientists
succeded in discovering the physical basis of those phenomena. In the
80’s the research did not continue, but the number of people complaining
that their nervous system is manipulated from outside started growing
from the begining of this decade.
Among the known physical concepts non-local electron and photon
connection can be used to explain telepathy. The ability of sound and
light technologies to influence human psyche is exemplified by
Psychowalkman industry. The existence of the electromagnetic mind
control technology is confirmed in the STOA report on crowd control
technologies (40), Conclusion of the Committee on Security of the
Russian State Duma [3] and can be deduced as well from scientific and
military literature.
Nerve impulses in the brain are carried by electrical signals
triggered by changes in chemical balance. During the fifties and sixties
of the past century, it was proved that human nervous system and
behavior can be thoroughly controlled by electric signals imported to
the brain by tiny electrodes (41). 100 stimulations of one point in the
bull‘s brain made him 100 times bellow.
When a man was asked to straighten his hand the bending of which was
stimulated he replied “I think your electricity is stronger than my
will.” By means of electrical stimulation of the brain the rhythm of
breathing and heart beat [this was even stopped for several pulses] was
affected as well as the function of the most of the viscera – like the
secretion of the gall bladder. The stimulation of areas in the brain
where feelings and emotions reside produced decisions.
A passive, depressed woman tore up a piece of paper when her center
of anger was stimulated: “I did not control myself. I had to get up and
tear”, she commented. An aggressive woman, with the same area
stimulated, got up and smashed against the wall the guitar she was
playing until the moment of stimulation. The intensity of feelings could
be controlled by turning the knob which reduced or increased the
intensity of the electric current. When the pleasure area was stimulated
women offered marriage to therapists. Stimulation of a particular area
in a female monkey‘s brain ended her motherly care for a newborn baby.
When the limbic system was stimulated the patients vigilance
weakened, they lost the ability to think, they often began to undress or
grope and when the stimulation stopped they could not remember what was
happening. The signals had to be delivered in specific frequencies to
produce repetitive action of neurons. Spanish scientist Jose Delgado
became world known when he, with the use of this technology, made a bull
attack him by pressing one button on the small black box and stopped
the bull few feet away from him by pressing another button.
The idea that electric currents in the brain could be induced by
electromagnetic energy is obviously subsequent step in this path of
research. The information inside of the brain is processed digitally; in
other words analog perceptions are “translated” and transferred by a
number and frequency of nerve impulses, while the intensity of the
feeling or perception usually corresponds to the intensity of electrical
current. Walter J. Freeman, who had been for years measuring the brain
activity in reaction to different stimuli by multitudes of
microelectrodes, presented already in 1975 a hypothesis “that a novel
external stimulus is broadly transmitted from the primary sensory cortex
or thalamus to other parts of the cortex… transmission occurs at some
characteristic frequency, and…reception occurs in … sets tuned to that
frequency” (37).
In other words, when neurons cooperate in the processing of specific
information they synchronize their activity and oscillate in the same
frequency. In an experiment by Wolf Singer (20) the differences in
brain activity in reaction to two different stimuli, presented to the
tested subject at the same time, were represented by two different
groups of neurons oscillating in different frequencies.
In the modern scientific literature synchronization of frequencies of
emitted nerve impulses in different parts of the brain as a principle
of brain functioning is generally accepted (19).
Electroencephalographers have no doubt that those synchronizations
appear on the EEG recordings and are already able to “read” in those
frequencies the single letters of a word perceived by the tested subject
(21). Theoretically this means that the events in the brain can be
produced “synthetically” from the outside when additional energy is
pumped into the brain in specific frequencies corresponding to specific
brain activities.
John Marks, in his book on CIA mind control research, quotes one of
the CIA research veterans recalling a colleague’s joke: “If you could
find the natural radio frequency of a person‘s sphincter, you could make
him run out of the room real fast” (22). Since most of the activity of
human brain takes place in frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz and
electromagnetic waves of this frequency are hundreds and even thousands
of miles long, and, for that matter, could not target human brain,
scientists started experimenting with pulsed microwaves. There are
“window” microwave frequencies which penetrate deep enough into the
brain tissue to produce activity of neurons there.
The interaction of electromagnetic radiation and chemicals in the
brain was proved for example by the experiment where irradiation of
rats’ heads by 20 and 40 mW/cm2 microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000
Hz woke the rats up in 5 minutes from narcosis (23). Electrical signals
of neurons in the brain are mediated by chemicals called
neurotransmitters.
At a conference on “Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine” in 1989 Capt.
Paul Tyler, director of the U.S. Navy Electromagnetic Radiation Project
between 1970 and 1977, quoted in his lecture the research of Dr. Merrit
who measured the decrease of norepinephrine, serotonine and dopamine
when a field of 80 mW/cm2 was applied (24). All those hormones act as
neurotransmitters into the cortex. Dopamin influences the ability to
learn and other cognitive abilities.
Disruption in the biosynthesis or transmission of dopamine can lead
to Parkinson’s disease. In another experiment a 500Hz signal produced
release of neradrenaline in sympathetical neurons (25). Since those
neurons control the muscles of internal organs and noraderenaline acts
there as a neurotransmitter, an oposite signal should be able to reduce
the activity of internal organs and eventually impair human health. The
publication of the World Health Organization on the effects of
electromagnetic radiation on living organisms from 1981 (25) gives many
examples of the effects of microwave radiation on the excretion of
glands and chemical composition of blood.
Many of those effects could harm human health. Microwave radiation
can also affect molecules of DNA and thus affect the development of
organisms (25). This was proved by an experiment by Yale
neurophysiologist, Jose Delgado, where the irradiation of chicken
embryos by 10, 100 and 1000 Hz stopped their development including the
development of hearts and veins. The experiment was replicated by the
American Navy with the same results. Such attack by microwaves could
have, in the long run, disastrous impact on targeted populations.
As a matter of fact microwave radiation can produce many deadly effects. In the experiment by McAffee
already mentioned, the microwaves pulsed at 300, 600 and 1000 Hz
produced impairment in breathing (even leading to suffocation) in rats.
A similar signal could also suffocate human beings. At the conference
on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in 1983 the
experiment was presented where blood clots were formed by microwave
radiation (26).
This capability is also suitable for weaponisation. Similarly
dangerous is the finding of Allan Frey that radio frequency radiation
can weaken the blood-brain barrier that prevents poisonous chemicals
from the access into the brain (30). In 1986 the American Air Force
issued a book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18). The
chapter “Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict”, was
written by Capt. Paul Tyler, who had been the director of the U.S. Navy
Electromagnetic Radiation Project from 1970 until 1977.
At the beginning of the chapter, Capt. Tyler quotes a source entitled
“Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical
Systems Through the Year 2000” that had been issued by American Air
Force in 1982: “Currently available data allow the projection that
specially generated radiofrequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose a
powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats … the passage
of approximately 100 miliamperes through the myocardium can lead to
cardiac standstill and death … A rapidly scanning RFR system could
provide an effective stun or kill capability over a large area. System
effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse
width, repetition frequency, and carrier frequency.”
In less draconian assault, the use of microwaves could be limited
just to the influence of human behavior. In 1985 Kathleen McAuliffe
visited Jose Delgado in his laboratory in Spain, where he experimented
with electromagnetic stimulation of brain. She subsequently wrote an
article for the magazine OMNI (27). Jose Delgado showed her how he
could make an ape fall asleep, or make it overactive, or how he could
calm down fighting fish using suitably modulated microwave radiation.
The next series of experiments shows that human behavior can be
controlled in even more intricate ways. In 1962 Allan H. Frey published
in the “Journal of Applied Physiology” (28) the results of
experimentation with transmission of sounds into the brain by
electromagnetic radiation at a distance of up to 1000 feet. The
“electromagnetic” sounds were heard by deaf as well as hearing people.
In his report, Frey writes that, by then, only the visual system had
been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy and he noted that, “With
somewhat different transmission parameters we can induce the perception
of severe buffeting of the head..” and ”Changing … parameters again,
one can induce a ‘pins-and-needles’ sensation.” Frey’s experiment was
replicated several times by other scientists (28).
Another, more advanced experiment that involved the transmission of
radio modulated with audible sounds into the brain, was published only
inadvertently in 1975, when Don R. Justesen published, in the article on
«Microwaves and Behavior» (29), the result of an experiment described
to him over the telephone conversation by his colleague J. C. Sharp, who
worked on a secret military project Pandora. Joseph C. Sharp at the
Walter Reed Army Institute improved the method of Frey to the point that
he was able to transmit into the experimental subject’s brain words
which he could understand.
The ability of U.S. military to produce perception of speech in
humans by microwave radiation substantiates the article by Sharon
Weinberger, “Mind Games”, which was published in The Washington Post in
January 2007. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed
for the article the Air Force released “records that note that the
patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air
Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads
of human subjects” The article also states that “the research
laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release
other materials” (31).
Robert Becker, who was twice nominated for Nobel price for his share
in the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of
broken bones, wrote in his book (30) about the experiment by J. F.
Schapitz, who stated:
“In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconcscious parts of the human brain – i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a chance to control the information input consciously.”
In one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred
questions, ranging from easy to technical ones. Later, not knowing they
were being irradiated, they would be subjected to information beams
suggesting the answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for
some of their correct answers, and memory falsification for other
correct answers. After 2 weeks they had to pass the test again (30).
The results of those experiments were never published. It is rather
evident that in those experiments the messages were sent into human
brain in ultrasound frequencies which the human brain perceives, but of
which the subject is unaware. According to Russian newspapers, in this
way, people may be programmed to perform different actions in the same
way people can be programmed under hypnosis. In Moscow there exists
Psychocorrection Center, where this method is used to heal psychical
diseases such as alcoholism.
The use of this method was questioned in the Russian press when
general Lev Rokhlin was killed by his wife in his sleep at 2 a.m. after
she had had a casual telephone conversation with a female friend. Did
her friend use a sequence of words which were supposed to trigger the
murderous action? Before his murder General Rokhlin planned for army
protests against army reform and visited editor’s desks of Russian
newspapers, telling them he might be soon killed in a car accident,
during a drinking spree or during an argument with his wife (42).
In his other book “Cross Currents” Robert Becker presents the report
coming from the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army
Institute, where J.C. Sharp carried out his experiment with the
transmission of words into the brain by radiofrequency radiation.
The report deals with the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous
system and describes the division of testing program into four parts:
1) prompt debilitating effects; 2) prompt stimulation auditory effects;
3) work interference (stoppage) effects; 4) effects on stimulus
controlled behavior. The report presents this conclusion: “Microwave
pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce
stimulation similar to electrical stimulation unrelated to heat” (32).
In the second volume of the Final Report on Biotechnology Research
Requirements for Aeronautical Sysmes of the American Air Force it is
stated: “While initial attention should be toward degradation of human
performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and
interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields…”
(33). In the second volume of the report the research was evaluated as
«progressing according to the schedule or in advance» and was supposed
to be terminated in 2010.
In the Soviet Russia the ongoing research in this area was completely
hidden from the public, but change of political system and actual use
of this equipment during the putsch against Gorbachov brought this
subject to newspapers headlines. According to Russian daily
newspapers, during the failed coup d’etat against Gorbachov, General
Kobets warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind
control technology could be used against them.
After the putsch, respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki
published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators
were mass produced in the Soviet Union and were used during the failed
coup d’etat [7], but failed to succeed due to the inexperience of the
personel who operated them. In the following spree of articles on the
subject of mind control, the experiment was published where manipulation
of masses of people by microwave radiation was performed.
Already in 1974, after successful testing on a military unit in
Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with
the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of
the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio
waves. Apparently, in 1974, the entire military unit was put to sleep
(5).
In the book “Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology” (18),
Captain Tyler also wrote: “Because of the many parameters involved and
the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific
response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an
enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing
an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or
unconventional” (18).
If you object that the range of frequencies in which the human
nervous system works is too narrow to provide for such a wide choice of
reactions, Capt. Tyler writes: “There are unconfirmed reports that
change of 0.01 Hz can make a difference.” Since many activities of
human brain are represented by different sequences of frequencies, this
provides for further large choices.
At the end of 1994 the first tests of the most powerful radar system
in the world were carried out in Alaska. This year its power should
reach 10 billion watts and later 100 billion watts. The main features
of the system include its ability to heat the ionosphere and in this way
change the altitude of the ionosphere. By this kind of manipulation of
the ionosphere, it is possible to bounce the electromagnetic waves back
from the ionosphere to whichever region of the planet one wishes to
target. According to the official information by the U.S. government
the system HAARP is designed for scientific research.
However, there are too many facts suggesting that the major reason
for its construction are military purposes. The main patent of Bernard J. Eastlund
(number 4,686,605) proposes the use of the system for destruction of
navigation systems of airplanes and missiles wherever in the atmosphere
they might be, and for interference with all communication systems
anywhere on the planet, and the global weather control. Other patents
connected with the system propose the use of the system for induction of
detonations in the extent of nuclear explosions and other military uses
(33).
Evidently, the warning of Russian intelligence agency FAPSI to the
Russian government and the article in the Russian daily “Segodnya” were
direct recations to the installation of the U.S. HAARP system. The
HAARP system can start pulsing microwave radiation with one thousandth
of one Hertz and this means that, when raising pulsing frequencies, it
can change pulses of microwave radiations by one thousandths of one
Hertz and can control the activity of human brain in frequencies from 1
to 100 Hertz which are crucial for functioning of human nervous system.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who apparently worked on the
American Navy’s project of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons “Sleeping
Beauty”, published, in a scientific magazine Perception and Motor Skills
the article where he states: “the technical capability to influence
directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of
the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities
by generating neural information within a physical medium within which
all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible”
(34).
John B. Alexander, who later became the Director of
Non-lethal Programs in Los Alamos National Laboratory, wrote in his
article in the Military Review in the year 1980: “whoever makes the
first major breakthrough in this field will have a quantum lead over his
opponent, an advantage similar to sole possession of nuclear weapons”
(35). Samuel Koslov, a leading personality of the Pandora project that
was dedicated to research of effects of microwave radiation on humans,
and a researcher at the John Hopkins University, in his closing speech
at the conference on Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems in
1984, said that the conference had proven that the external electric
fields can “become a key to the cellular control console.
The implications, social, economic, and even military are enormous.”
Koslov went on: “If much of what we have heard is indeed correct, it
may be not less significant to the nation than the prospects that faced
the physics community in 1939 when the long-time predicted
fissionability of the nucleus was actually demonstrated. You may recall
the famous letter of Albert Einstein to President Roosvelt. When we’re
in a position to do so in terms of our proofs, I would propose that an
analogous letter is required” (26).
It is this perspective, of the revolutionary nature of these
scientific developments, that gives us the title, “Revolution in
Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, of a book published by the
Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College in 1994 (36).
Since the national security information is in question, the book cannot
tell the readers what technology exactly is making this revolution
feasible.
From the beginning the authors were aware that the use of this
technology may run counter to basic moral and political values of the
American society, and in consequence the revolution in military affairs
would require a moral and political revolution to come first: ”In the
pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were
primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era,
it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the
minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and
domestic…
Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic
”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and
national sovereignty changed.” Since it is difficult for them to imagine
that the American society would accept the ethical and political
revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a
scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to
back this revolution.
The scenario is placed into the year 2000, and is based on the
situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality. In
the document Rebuilding Americas Defenses, backed by the past U.S.
government, we read: “To preserve American military preeminence in the
coming decades, the Department of Defense must … seek to exploit the
emerging revolution in military affairs … Further, the process of
transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a
long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new
Pearl Harbor” (ref. 13, pg. 51).
Was it by accident that in 2001 a massive terrorist attack ocurred in
the USA facilitated by questionable work of U.S. intelligence services
and explosives in the World Trade Center and followed by anthrax attacks
where the only indicted scientist, Bruce Ivins, did not have the
technical means and scientific knowledge to turn the anthrax spores into
a deadly aerosol which was used and that those two attacks were
followed by an assault on privacy of U.S. Citizens and international
law?
The scenario goes on: “The president was thus amenable to the use of
the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA
(revolution in military affairs) in conflict short of war … As
technology changed the way force was applied, things such as personal
courage, face-to-face leadership, and the ‘warfighter’ mentality became
irrelevant.” So the psychotechnology, which formed the core of the RMA,
provided new methods for influencing the psyche of the adversary, in
place of the classical strategy to make him fear his death.
The book goes on: “Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency
around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency
Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’,
with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and
focus psychological campaigns for each.
There is also potential for defensive psychotechnology such as
‘strategic personality simulations’ to aid national security decision
makers.” (See Norman D. Livergood and Stephen D. Williams, “Strategic
Personality Simulation: A New Strategic Concept”, unpublished draft
paper, Carlisle Barracks, PAK: U.S. Army War College, 1994). Human
behovior and thinking is substantially controlled by emotions. If
simulated emotions are broadcasted into somebody’s nervous system they
will orient his thinking and behavior.
Thoughts are another organizer of human behavior and personal
thoughts can be overridden by ultrasound messages. In other words if
there was, for example, a new Jesus Christ, U.S. agencies would simply
engineer his personality to make sure he would not introduce any
cultural changes. Once the strategy of computerized personality
simulation is applied, the unfolding of human history will be totally
controlled by elites having exclusive access to those technologies. The
conclusion of the authors was: “Whether we opt for revolution or
evolution, change will occur.”
The concept of the “strategic personality stimulation” is probably
tested on some of the people in the USA who claim to be mind control
experiments victims, whose number, rapidly growing after 9/11 attacks,
inspired the article in Washington Post, entitled “Mind Games” (31) in
2007. Cheryl Welsh, the director of the American organization Mind
Justice (38) claims that she has received over 2500 complaints from U.S.
citizens.
Though some of those people may be mentally ill, many of them defend
themselves in a rational way that suggests that they may be mentally
sound. The same situation is in Russia. Russian politician Vladimir
Lopatin even admitted nonconsensual human-subject experiments had been
conducted in Russia, when he wrote in the quoted book: “Compensation of
damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons
suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in
legal trial…” (14). Growing numbers of complaints are coming as well
from China, India and Japan (over 200).
The European Parliament reacted to the installation of HAARP system
by calling for “an international convention introducing a global ban on
all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form
of manipulation of human beings” (15, Paragraph 27). The body of the
European Parliament STOA (Scientific and Technolgical Options
Assessment) in the document “Crowd Control Technologies”, stated that
„some of these concerns… have been more specifically covered by the
resolution on legal aspects of military activities passed at the meeting
of the EP_s Foreign Affairs, Security and defence Policy which called
for an international convention and global ban on all research and
development , whether civilian or military , which seeks to apply
knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other
functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any
actual or possible deployment of such systems. (40, pg CII, ref. 369).
The „actual“ deployment of those means confirmed US Congressman
Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of a Bill introduced into the US
Congress in October 2001 proposing a ban on the deployment of “mind
control” weapons, when he was quoted to assert that those weapons
actually exist and “those people who control them are deadly serious and
intend to use them, if we don’t stop the weaponisation of space” (10).
Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of the functioning
of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in
the USA (8) and all technologies enabling access to human brain are
subject to the same law in the Russian Federation (9). Under such
conditions, the mass media cannot fully disclose the existence and
capacities of those technologies and world public cannot be engaged in
favour of a ban on the use of such capabilities.
The ownership of those technologies gives opportunity to governments
to use them against individuals (and eventually against masses), without
giving them any access to any legal remedy. The concept of the world
respecting freedom and human rights is fundamentally corrupted in this
way. In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State
Duma stated that capabilities enabling remote control of human nervous
system or the remote infliction of health impairment are available to
many modern governments (3).
This was confirmed by the article from the U.S. army weekly Defense
News stating that mind control technologies were used by the Israelis
against the Palestinians (12). As well ousted Hunduran president Manuel
Zelaya, while under siege in Brazilian embassy in Honduras, complained
that he had been subjected to an «electron bombardment with microwaves»
which produces «headache and organic destabilisation» (44). When asked
by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now: „As president, do you know about
this in the Honduran arsenal?” He replied: „Yes, of course“ (45).
Evidently the secret arms race among the world governments may
continue until the information war actually breaks out. V. Lopatin, in
the book “Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia”, stated that
psychotronic war is, as a matter of fact, “already taking place without
declaration of war”. In this way the human world may sink into some
kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking,
feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an
“information war” or, in the worst case, into the reality where large
masses of people will be killed, and unlike the aftermath of the use of
nuclear weapons, the planet will still remain inhabitable for the
survivors.
With emerging energetic, financial and climate crises either the next
world war could erupt, or the means of remote manipulation of human
brains and organisms could be applied to control dissatisfied citizens.
In the conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State
Duma it is stated: “Phone lines, heating and sewer pipes, TVs, fire
signalisation can be used as transmitting antennas” (3). Our elected
democratic representatives are responsible for foreseeing the emerging
crises and preventing them from happening by appropriate measures.
However, they do not have mandate from citizens to allow those crises
to happen, and then use technologies of mind manipulation to do away
with citizen’s dissatisfaction. If this technology is once used against
citizens it is questionable whether true democracy will be restored one
day. The countries with the most advanced military technologies include
the USA, which has never proposed any international initiative aimed at
securing the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human
beings.
According to the study “Crowd Control Technologies” published by the
European Parliament’s STOA office, the USA are the major promoter of
the use of those arms. (In fact, it was principally the efforts of the
USA government to persuade this outcome that ensured the inclusion in
NATO military doctrine of non-lethal technology.) The STOA states:
“In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons
and their place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools
identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and
“radio frequency weapons”. Directed energy system is further defined:
„Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source
to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level“ (40).
According to the Russian government intelligence agency FAPSI, in the
last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of
the means of informational war grew fourfold and at the present time
they occupy the first place among all military programs (17),(3). Though
there are concepts of informational warfare other than the remote
control of human beings, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the
negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains
suggests an intention to use those means in internal as well as in
international affairs. If the USA achieve essential military
preeminence in this area and if no global ban of the use of those
technologies against civilians is negotiated, the USA may become a world
totalitarian superpower of the new type.
So far the only government who made a small step toward the ban of
those technologies is the Russian Federation where the addendum to the
article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons” was approved on
July 26, 2001. The legislation states: “within the territory of the
Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other
objects … the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of
electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic
radiations…”.
Besides omitting the use of the term “psychotronic energy” that both
Lopatin and Kucinich used, the Russian legislation does not provide any
means for Russian citizens to defend themselves against the use of those
weapons. Nor is there any compulsion upon the police or public health
organizations to set up teams capable of detecting radiation that was
enabling remote manipulation of human body and nervous system, or the
source of such radiation. Nor does this legislation prohibit Russian
government agencies from the use of such technology against their own
citizens.
In the USA alone, some of the federal states have enacted in their
laws on firearms, new standards on electric and electromagnetic weapons
(Michigan in 2003, Massachusetts in 2004, Maine in 2005). Sanctions go
from 15 years in jail to life imprisonment, identically with weapons of
mass destruction. As in Russia, those laws do not provide for the
defense of citizens against the use of those weapons by government
agencies.
On February 25, 2009 Deputy Chief of General Staff of Russian Army,
Anatoli Nogovicyn, stated that within 2 or 3 years a full fledged war
in informational sphere, including “information-psychlogical influence
on population and military units” may break out (39). So far
politicians (especially in the USA) have not shown responsible intention
to take action to stop this new arms race, which threatens to place
human beings in a position subsidiary to machines and to destroy
democracy.
Humanitarian organizations apparently do not dare to challenge this
National Security Information (on several occasions Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch have refused to engage with this
issue). Under such circumstances, it is left to citizens themselves to
organize defense of their freedoms and elementary human rights, before
those technologies are used at war or to suppress their dissatisfaction
with governments who failed to prevent the emerging crises. They should
coordinate their efforts internationally if they want to succeed.
1) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original – “Riders of
Psychotronic”, concise English translation of «Riders of Psychotronic
Apocalypse» at – http://mojmir.webuda.com
2) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original: “Zombeing Bluff or” –
concise English translation of the article «The Project Zombie is a
Bluff or…?» – http://mojmir.webuda.com
3) see Russian original “Dokument” – http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz , translation – “State Duma” – http://mojmir.webuda.com
5) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original “Installation Radiosleep”, concise English translation http://mojmir.webuda.com - «Installation Radiosleep»
6) http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 27-37 concise overview of the book other excerpts you will find at the address http://mojmir.webuda.com
7) Russian original – http://web.io.cz.mhzzrz
: “Authors of Project Zombie”, concise English translation –
http://mojmir.webuda.com – «Authors of Project Zombie Discovered in
Kiev».
8) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – see memorandum of the Department of
the Air Force, Assembly State of New York and Communicating via the
Microwave Auditory Effect or article „Mind Games“ in Washington Post
from January 2006, where an experiment with microwave transmission of
spoken phrases into the human brain was published as well as the fact
that this technology is subject to the National Security Information law
9) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz – Russian original: “Secret Weapon in Action” – concise translation «Secret Superweapon in Action»: http://mojmir.webuda.com
10) see the article from Berkeley Daily Planet» http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550
12) http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Israel Fields Means to Suppress Palestinian Violence
14) http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 36, or concise
English translation of the book „Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of
Russia“ at http://mojmir.webuda.com
15) Resolution on the environment, security and foreign policy PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN»>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pv2/pv2?PRG=DOCPV&APP=PV2&DATE=280199&DATEF=990128&TPV=DEF&TYPEF=A4&POS=1&SDOCTA=8&TXTLST=1&Type_Doc=RESOL&PrgPrev=TYPEF@A4%7CPRG@QUERY%7CAPP@PV2%7CFILE@BIBLIO99%7CNUMERO@5%7CYEAR@99%7CPLAGE@1&LANGUE=EN
16) Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation
there see pg. 3 – Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the
Russian Federation) http://www.mid.ru/ns-osndoc.nsf/1e5f0de28fe77fdcc32575d900298676/2deaa9ee15ddd24bc32575d9002c442b? OpenDocument
17) See ref. 16, pg. 19, “The International Cooperation of the
Russian Federation in the Field of Ensuring Information Security»
18) Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology, ed. Lt.Col. J.
Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Center for Aerospace Doctrine,
Research and Education, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, june 1986 (on
Internet the site exists, but can not be found)
19) Francis H. Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis. The Scientific Search for the Soul, Simon and Schuster, London, 1994, U.K.
20) Wolf Singer: The Formation of Representations in the Cerebral
Cortex, 1992, Editor: Arzneimittelinformation/Medizinische redaktion,
Schering, Germany, ISSN 0940-9300
21) Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,
supplement no. 45, 1996, “Continuous Wave-Form Analysis”, page 64
22) John Marks: The CIA and Mind Control – the Search for Manchurian Candidate, USA, 1988, ISBN 0-440-20137-3
23) James C. Lin: Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications,
Charles C. Thomas publisher, Springfield, Illinois, USA, ISBN
0-398-03704-3, (experiments by McAffee conducted in 1961, 1962 and 1970)
24) Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine, 1990, conference proceedings
25) Critere d’hygiene de l’environment, frequence radioelectric et
hyperfrequences, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland, 1981
26) Nonlinear Electrodynamics in Biological Systems, ed. Ross Adey,
proceedings of the conference, Plenum Press, New York, London, 1984
27) magazine OMNI, February 1985, Kathleen McAuliffe «The Mind Fields»
28) Allan H. Frey, 1962, Human Auditory System Response to Modulated
Electromagnetic Energy, Journal of Aplied Physiology, 17/4, pg. 689 –
692 – http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/689 E..M. Taylor. B-. Ashelman, 1974, Analysis of Central Nervous System
Involvment in Microwave Auditory Effects, Brain research, vol. 74, pg. 201 -206
J.L. Flanagan, 1961, Audibility of Periodic Pulses and a Model for
the Threshold, Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 33 (11), pg.
1540 – 49 K.R. Foster, E.D. Finch, 1974, Microwave Hearing: evidence
for Thermoacoustic Auditory Stimulation by Pulsed Microwaves, Science,
vol. 185, pg. 256 -258
29) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391
30) Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985
32) Robert Becker: Cross Currents, The Startling Effects of
Electromagnetic Radiation on Your Health, 1991, Bloomsberry Publishing,
London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0-7475-0761-9
33) Dr. Nick Begich, Jeanne Maning: Angels Don’t Play this HAARP,
Earthpulse Press, P.O. Box 393, Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA (on
Internet you will find the reference to the “Final Report…” but the site
can not be found)
34) M.A. Persinger: On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every
Human brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms,
Perception and Motor Skills, june 1995, vol. 80, pg. 791 -799 - http://www.whale.to/b/persinger.html , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7567396
35) John B. Alexander: The New Mental Battelfield: Beam me up Spock, Military Review, Dec. 1980 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon16.htm
36) Steven Metz, James Kievit, «The Revolution in Military Affairs
and Conflict Short of War, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies
Institute, Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5050 http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=241
37) Mlada Fronta Dnes, March 28, 1997 (the Czech newspaper)
40) Working document for STOA panel of the European Parliament entitled “Crowd Control Technologies” http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET%282000%29168394%28PAR01%29_EN.pdf (pg. Xlvi)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET%282000%29168394%28PAR00%29_EN.pdf (Appendix 6-67)
41) Jose M. R. Delgado: Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society, 1969, USA
42) Russian weekly “Argumenty I Fakty”, number 32, August 2003,
article title: “Versii ubiistva generala Rokhlina” (Versions of Murder
of General Rokhlin)
43) Walter J. Freeman: Mass Action in the Nervous System, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London, 1975
44) Manuel Zelaya undergoes strange siege inside Brazilian embassy, Fabiano Maisonnave, The Guardian, Sunday 25 October 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/25/honduras-manuel-zelaya-embassy-siege
45) Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya Speaks from the
Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, Democracy Now, Monday, October 5, 2009
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/10/5/ousted_honduran_president_manuel_zelaya_speaks Mojmir Babacek (edited by John Allman and Rudy Andria)
